Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakaway (Tinchy Stryder song)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 October 23.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Breakaway (Tinchy Stryder song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not very notable. Page has no context at all, single referance, subject doesn't need it's own article Alan - talk 23:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 01:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect -- As per WP:NSONG: "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." This article will unlikely ever grow beyond a stub. Therefore, a redirect is more appropriate, despite issues regarding notability. Singularity42 (talk) 02:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The closest thing to "significant coverage" I can find is Tinchy answering a question about the song during this online interview. Absent any sources better than this, I don't feel this article can pass WP:NSONG. The name of the article is an unlikely search term, so I vote to Delete unless a more significant WP:RS is presented. Gongshow ^Talk 07:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete merge single charting details into album page, info wouldnt also be present in discography. will never have enough info to warrant a full article. Mister sparky (talk) 08:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No need to keep as a redirect as an unlikely search term. Adambro (talk) 12:41, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.