Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazilian Science Protests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Quite apart from any consideration of notability, the article was created by a block-evading sockpuppet: See CSD G5. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:45, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian Science Protests[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First, I get no hits for "Brazilian Science Protest" so this is poorly named to begin with, but the one article about this specific protest does not mention the March for Science as the protest occurred in 2016. This is OR in an attempt to justify the significance of this one event. Brazil's actions could be included at March for Science if other articles available tie recent happenings in Brazil to the "March for Science movement", but these Science mag and NPR articles from after the March for Science occurred don't even mention it. Rhinopias (talk) 22:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addition: my text "does not mention the March for Science" is in reference to an older version which was changed after the nomination. Rhinopias (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:58, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sure there's protests but this isn't a thing of notability, yet. Drmies (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There's a notable topic here but the article may be better moved to 2017 Brazil science budget cuts - I don't think this article has anything to do with March for Science and it looks like it has been improved since the nomination. Additional sources attesting to notability:
- zdnet
- cambridge - threaten future of research
- cbc - brazil's scientists leaving country
- continued converage in October 2017
- more continued coverage in October

Seraphim System ^(talk) 08:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.