Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazilian Consulate General, Los Angeles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brazilian Consulate General, Los Angeles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. all this article does is confirm the consulate exists. embassies are not inherently notable and consulates even less so. Similar AfD here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazilian Consulate General, San Francisco LibStar (talk) 15:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bharatiya29 (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Bharatiya29 (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Brazilian diplomatic missions or simply delete as there's nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 22:36, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. When one source is the tenant list of the building it is in I can not help to think a new low has been reached for 'third party' sources. It is not even worth a redirect. Jbh ^Talk 18:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG, it exists, so what? Kraxler (talk) 01:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.