Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bratz: Pampered Petz (soundtrack)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bratz discography. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 21:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bratz: Pampered Petz (soundtrack)[edit]

Bratz: Pampered Petz (soundtrack) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album has zero notability and no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Attempts to redirect have been reverted, but really this article has no reason to exist. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 22:39, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Totally non notable and unsourced. A lot of Bratz songs have articles and they should be deleted too. Clearly someone is obsessed with Bratz or is doing this for advertisement.*Treker (talk) 12:29, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Bratz discography. Album is non-notable. The editor who created this is on a one-person campaign to flood Wikipedia with Bratz fancruft.TheLongTone (talk) 15:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect as this seems applicable, perhaps no serious needs for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 04:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.