Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brass Crescent Awards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brass Crescent Awards[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced article about a "best blog" award with no strong claim of notability. As always, every award is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because its own self-published web presence technically metaverifies its own existence -- just as with any other topic, the notability test is the reception of media coverage about it in reliable sources it didn't create itself. But, of course, the only sources present here are its own self-published web presence rather than any evidence of media attention being paid to it, and it's been flagged for that problem since 2009 without ever having any independent sources added. Bearcat (talk) 02:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 02:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Barely found anything about the awarding. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.