Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brass (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brass (company)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can see no evidence of notability here. Most of the refs are niche publications in the advertising industry just noting its existence. The BBC ref is simply about the UK Budget and not about Brass. The rest are just recording the facts about the nativity of Brass and its cost cutting. Nothing there to indicate notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:14, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam, which, in a new twist, attempts to inherit notability from the building the company is located in:

"Brass is based in Moorfield House, Headingley, Leeds, which is a Grade II listed building in the Headingley Conservation Area. The listing describes the building as being “in Tudor Gothic Revival Style".

K.e.coffman (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.