Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandvery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted per CSD A7 RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brandvery[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, zero mentions in secondary sources. This article has been speedily deleted under A7 previously. When it reappeared in an almost identical format I nominated it again but the CSD template was removed by a non-logged-in user. I would support a Speedy Deletion (A7) as WP:SNOW should apply. Exemplo347 (talk) 10:14, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 10:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (probably CSD A7) and salt: A WP:SPA article on a newly established firm/site (registered last month). There is no claim of notability and my searches (Highbeam, Google) are turning up no evidence of notability. I see no reason that IP removal of a CSD template - contrary to the instructed method to oppose CSD - should persist an article longer than necessary so am also reinstating the CSD A7. AllyD (talk) 11:26, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.