Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandi cyrus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 06:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brandi cyrus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No major roles [1], being related to someone famous does not make her notable. Schuhpuppe (talk) 02:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Before anyone mentions speedy deletion again, notice that Brandi Cyrus has been speedily deleted six times over the past three years (and redirected to Billy Ray Cyrus twice and to Miley Cyrus once). That's six re-creations indicating that notability is disputed. Uncle G (talk) 02:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- —mono 03:08, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Although the subject has famous relatives, I can't find enough sources to establish that she herself is sufficiently notable for an article yet. (Note, however, that the subject is apparently focused more on being a musician than an actress.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:14, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Maybe Wikipedia Signpost can start a weekly list of the lamest attempts to sneak into WP. This is Top 10 fodder for sure. I especially liked this: "She also dated Samuel Hancock from November of 2009 until January of 2010 because of relationship issues." Stellar! I'm left wanting more: Where did they go to dinner? What did they eat? Carrite (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Delete per nom. Lionel (talk) 05:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Burn and SALT --mboverload @ 01:27, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The deletion opinions expressed above would carry much more weight if they were to explain why the sources found by the Google News and Books searches linked above are insufficient to demonstrate notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:11, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply The book result is a biography about Miley Cyrus which just happens to mention that she has a sister. Similarily for most of the news results: ...with her sister Brandi Cyrus on hand for moral support... etc. --Schuhpuppe (talk) 12:58, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.