Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brahms Gang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:14, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brahms Gang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject has no notability, no value, and is entirely undocumented.--Galassi (talk) 11:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think a brief mention in the net.legends faq is enough, and that's the only secondary sourcing for this that I could find (there's plenty of primary sourcing in the usenet archives, of course). And, tangentially, how come C. J. Silverio never gets mentioned as one of the gangsters? —David Eppstein (talk) 03:34, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per reasons given and this is already covered (unsourced) in the Gene Ward Smith article. There might be a case for usenet related subject that had some significant influence, but getting involved in some flame wars doesn't cut it.--RDBury (talk) 21:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.