Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Porteous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. I failed to search for results using his nickname. (non-admin closure)‎ JTtheOG (talk) 22:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Porteous[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cricketer BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and South Africa. JTtheOG (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Crearly fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Not enough sources online to establish notability.--Tumbuka Arch (talk) 22:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - SIG, COV exists. He has played the highest level of South African domestic cricket. --JP (Talk) 07:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to be other WP:GNG passing sourcing in a simple search such as this along with what JP has found. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has played at a sufficient level, making enough appearances, plus there are sources to satisfy WP:GNG. AA (talk) 10:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.