Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley D. King

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ethically^Yours! 12:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley D. King[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with no in-depth secondary sources; King is merely namechecked as the director of a film in a quoted press release, and listed as such on IMDB. McGeddon (talk) 17:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The creator mentioned on the Talk page that he could include panel discussion sources. I think those would count as secondary sources, since they are a feature of film festivals and are critics discussing the film and probably the director. There are also a good number of interviews of King and Cooper about the film, for example: [1] [2] [3]. Plus the awards, which are pretty impressive. I don't think they are major festivals, but some of them do have articles on WP, and just the number of awards. Too many, in fact. If the article survives, the list should be shortened to just the more important ones and converted to prose. – Margin1522 (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to the above mentioned interviews by Margin1522, I found numerous positive reviews. I added a few quotes from some of the reviews to the article. This article passes WP:GNG in my view. WordSeventeen (talk) 20:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.