Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Brooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Brooks[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was PRODded and REFUNDed. Brooks still fails GNG. Winning a youth world championship doesn't make him notable either. Dougal18 (talk) 15:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable darts player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't know if I can agree with the statement that winning the PDC World Youth championship doesn't make him notable. For that very reason, I think that a deletion is going to incur a never ending battle to keep it. Can we make some progresss in better establishing darts notability, since most of the 249 Category:Professional Darts Corporation associate players (that have never played on the full circuit) would be far less notable, having never won a televised title? I feel it would be much more productive to try to establish some guidelines, than to seemingly randomly pick some players. Then instead of having the same discussion over and over again, we can refer to a consensus. DLManiac (talk) 06:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I disagree with the assertion that winning the World Youth Championship doesn't make Brooks notable; and feel that the level of coverage Brooks has received matches up with GNG regardless. OZOO (t) (c) 16:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The relentless deletion of darts players for no reason at all is just ridiculous. There are loads more tedious players in other sports, and they don't seem to be deleted any time soon. There needs to be some solid rules for darts players. I was trying to create loads, and a lot of them got deleted. If any darts player has appeared in a televised event, they should be safe from deletion, as should all players who have played in a PDC European Tour event, as that's the next highest level up. These people don't seem to realise how big a deal darts is at the moment. JRRobinson (talk) 09:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a well-supported article, and I for one don't have a notability concern.--Concertmusic (talk) 23:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.