Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Sucks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz talk 23:10, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Sucks[edit]

Brad Sucks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I Don't Know What I'm Doing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a musician, whose claims of notability are not properly sourced. This was a good faith creation in 2005, when our criteria for the notability of musicians were a lot looser than they are in 2018 -- but the guy simply doesn't have the media coverage needed to clear the standards that apply today. Five of the six footnotes here are primary sources, not reliable or notability-supporting ones, and the only one that's actually to a media outlet is a Q&A interview in which he's talking about himself in a local interest magazine in his own hometown. There simply isn't a notability claim here that passes WP:NMUSIC as it stands today, and there's no quality sourcing on which to base a WP:GNG claim on either. Bearcat (talk) 02:00, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:43, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.