Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Rushing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 00:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Rushing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was previously PRODed by Eeekster, PROD tag was removed, am now bringing here to AfD. Article's single reference is to a passing mention for being the recipient of an award— it contains no information that could be used to create a standalone article. Google searches turn up repeated hits for his résumé at shootonline.com which appears to lack independence from the subject. Although the subject looks like he has won a national competitive award for music video cinematography, I could not find any substantive coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources to substantiate a notability claim. KDS4444 (talk) 19:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wak keep. I see 2 moderately significant awards for two different films, so I think that's sufficient. DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Two decent references Talk Podcast and Vimeo interview Here I would advise the editor source more references if salvageable. 80.193.74.158 (talk) 15:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.