Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Posey (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Posey[edit]

Brad Posey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing enough independent coverage to pass WP:BIO. Looks like the previous AfD scraped by via PORNBIO (15 years ago), which has since been deprecated. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:58, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, there is a Brad Posey, for whom there are plenty of references like [1], [2], [3]. But I doubt if he is the subject of the article. Will like to ask other editors to comment on this. Chirota (talk) 10:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This article makes claims that the sources do not at all support. Neither source in any way could show he has a large following. IMDB is totally not reliable, and in no way an indication of notability, and we cannot use his own self created portfolio to show notability either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I don't know how the AVNs work but according to the version of the article back when it was first nominated, it seems like the video was the one that won rather than him? So I'm not sure about WP:ANYBIO or WP:NACTOR. Unless somebody who is more knowledgable about the space can verify his contribution to the industry, it's very difficult for a layman like me to add much. As is, it seems like it fails WP:GNG but if he is as notable as others thought he was, there should be notable mentions of him somewhere. — BriefEdits (talk) 23:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.