Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Ahern
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Brad Ahern[edit]
- Brad Ahern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Hoax/non-notable article. Initially created claiming that he was an Australian footballer who played over 100 times for Brazil. Then recreated claiming he was a football coach who had coached many of the world's best known players. Now had a section added claiming that he was an orienteerer with a link to the Australian 1982 championships, in which there was a person called Brad Ahern, though I don't believe he is notable. пﮟოьεԻ 57 11:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article now claims he is notable for baseball as well, must be a joke. Do they even play that in Australia? Northwestgnome (talk) 11:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, yes, but it's a minority sport. Most Australians would know the basics of how to play, but probably haven't watched a full game. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 12:20, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Of course they play baseball in Australia - see Australian Baseball Federation. The article above is bogus however. -- Mattinbgn\talk 12:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, the NEITA award thing at least is true: [1]. The rest sounds fairly implausible however, the orienteering chap didn't even finish the course so I don't see how that proves he was #9. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 14:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a waste of space. Ridiculous article. No reliable references. No worthwhile content. Probably a hoax. Delete, quick smart.--Lester 21:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube (talk) 22:16, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 23:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.