Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boy Better Know (3rd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Boy Better Know[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Boy Better Know (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:TNT. Launchballer 08:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- There was consensus at the last AFD to keep the article. It was shorter then, but better sourced; it was expanded in 2012 but the references were removed. WP:TNT is an essay for use "if the article's content is useless (including all the versions in history)..." which isn't the situation here. Peter James (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.