Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boundary, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 16:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boundary, Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability, advertisement, orphan Notnoteworthy (talk) 06:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article could use some improving, but the listed references show significant coverage about the company from a New York Times blog, Information Week, The Register, etc. IMO it clearly passes WP:CORP. --MelanieN (talk) 17:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 08:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is notable as the coverage shows. SL93 (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.