Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottle Rockets (magazine)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bottle Rockets (magazine)[edit]
- Bottle Rockets (magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Even more poorly referenced than tinywords. I don't claim much expertise here, but hopefully someone produces WP:GNG-compliant sources. The HSA catalog may be considered somewhat independent at tinywords, but less so here. Someone not using his real name (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 16:17, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Books, News and Websearches fail to uncover any substantial independent coverage. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 21:40, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I suppose I should have noted here as well (besides on the article's talk page) that there is an interview with the editor/publisher at doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2003.10.007, which seems to focus on the magazine. (Don't ask me for the full text.) Someone not using his real name (talk) 13:01, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. --Edcolins (talk) 21:01, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.