Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borzák Márton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Borzák Márton[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic has no coverage in reliable sources and the provided references are mostly from primary sources alone. smtchahal^(talk) 07:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am not finding any sources that could attest to the subject's notability. The article text does list various awards and exhibitions (which I flagged for citation and none has been added). Looking at them again, it isn't clear that any would be sufficient to demonstrate notability anyway. AllyD (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per AllyD and nom. If Studio Borzak had an article, you might have an argument for a redirect, but that's not the case here. You might also find, as per WP:USUAL, that this subject ends up working on a notable project or otherwise becoming more notable - and then you might consider an article. But there is no evidence - and no sourcing - that indicates that at this time. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:39, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.