Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Born This Way (Glee)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep with snow (bold non-admin closure). CycloneGU (talk) 20:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Born This Way (Glee)[edit]
- Born This Way (Glee) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete as nominator I feel it's a little too early to start this article. "Night of Neglect" is fine, because it's the next episode, but I don't think this one is ready to start. Wikipedia is an encyopedia, not a crystall ball! Kanavb (talk) 09:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I don't feel like this is too much of crystal-balling. It would be different if this was about articles on episodes from the third season, but this is merely the second episode to be aired next month, which has been confirmed by the sources you can see in the article. I don't think we should waste our time with deleting this and recreating it in two weeks. SilverserenC 09:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Though I still happen to disagree, at least wait till we can get a reliable source giving us a date. We just can't predict it'll air a week after Night of Neglect, according to this. We've never added episodes so early, so I don't see why this time should be an exception. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanavb (talk • contribs) 09:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The nominator shouldn't vote delete in the discussion itself, as it is already assumed that, because you made the nomination, that you think it should be deleted (unless you state otherwise in the nomination section itself). Voting delete again in the discussion part is redundant, unnecessary, and can be seen as gaming the system. That's why I removed your second delete vote, please don't add it back again. SilverserenC 09:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - sources are accumulating. And soon it will have aired. It was even discussed weeks before "Born This Way" come out, so it has this massive pre-airing deal-brokering history that is about to unfold.12:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - I concur. SunCountryGuy 01 16:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (stub creator). There are enough details, and the episode will air soon. --Another Believer (Talk) 14:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above, enough sources to justify. CTJF83 16:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article as it currently stands deals with any crystal issues via sufficent referencing and I also agree with Silver's point about deleting and having to recreate later. Whether as a function of time or this AfD, the article is in fine shape now. As a side note to Kanavb - welcome to the community! :-) --Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per more sources added to justify notability. HorrorFan121 (talk) 17:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I was going to vote to delete, but then I took a second look at the article, and saw that there is now a production section, which would be too long to add it to another page. JDDJS (talk) 19:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.