Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bordersdown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:59, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bordersdown[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic furthermore lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It's currently unreferenced and had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search (only hits were in comments sections). There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. – czar 14:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NWEB. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It used to be referenced / linked by Gamerankings as NTSC-uk.com http://www.gamerankings.com/sites/785-ntsc-uk/index.html, but then the domain name was hijacked and it had to be relaunched as Bordersdown. The NTSC-uk.com domain recently expired (many years later), so it was repurchased by the Bordersdown team, but too hard to go back to the old name, so now it's just a redirect. I don't think there's a need for a wiki page for Bordersdown and it should be deleted. --Charlesr (talk) 20:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Just not notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing on searches to show that it meets either WP:GNG or WP:NWEB. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:43, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.