Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bop It Test Modes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. as WP:G7.Deleted by BU Rob13 (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bop It Test Modes[edit]

Bop It Test Modes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems a HOWTO, was prodded, but the prod was removed. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOT. Kleuske (talk) 02:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Not clear what this is about, probably the testing of a toy; in any case, not notable and inadequate context. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; content seems to be about debugging multiple toys in the Bop-It line, but indeed WP:NOTGUIDE applies here and possibly WP:CV if anyone can find the original video the text is 'a text quotation' from, according to the article. Samario: Talk page 11:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Might as well pile on WP:OR here too, as this is something that is of interest to only a select few and we cannot determine if any of this is true. Nate (chatter) 13:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete For several reasons, most notably its lack of notability or sources. But WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:OR both probably apply here as well. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 16:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Basically fails the not a how to guide rules for Wikipedia. Also gives too little context, but even more context would not overcome the other problem.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Author C&P moved the content to Electronic Game Test Modes. This article is now blank. RA0808 talkcontribs 20:22, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.