Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boovabee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted as A11. Fram (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boovabee[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable neologism, possibly made up by page author -- BigPimpinBrah (talk) 04:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't help but feel there's some speedy criterion that could apply here. G3, perhaps? Needless to say, nothing remotely like a reliable source here. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 06:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't think there's a speedy for this but it can be snowballed under WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A DICTIONARY! - Pmedema (talk) 20:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thought it out and maybe could be speedied under WP:CSD#A11? - Pmedema (talk) 20:32, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I thought about that, but there's no indication in the article that it was invented by the author. --BigPimpinBrah (talk) 20:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - preferably snow delete, out of scope, high likely vandalism or made out, if not consider transferring to Wiktionary. Alex^{discussion ★} 01:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.