Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bootleggers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Google is not enough, especially for small but focused online communities (too much intra-community linking biases the results); Alexa ranking of main website > 60,000. I've created the redirect to Bootlegger myself. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 19:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bootleggers[edit]

Delete Inappropriate for Wikipedia, Uncylcopedic Vercalos 06:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, gamecruft. Royboy crashfan 07:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Eivind 10:17, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As much as i hate to do this, for the article is long, but delete. and make a redirect to bootlegger. Chris Chan.talk.contribs 15:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Jim62sch 20:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it's a well-known online game with a reasonably large community. Rob T Firefly 01:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, then redirect to bootlegger, under {{R from plural}}. Stifle 17:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it. bootlegger and bootleggers are way different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.118.208.103 (talk • contribs)

comment How are they 'way different'?--Vercalos 17:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As Above. Aus 12:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Delete all the definition: They are inappropriate in Wikipedia. Please have them redirected to bootlegger. COMMODORE64 10:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Bootleggers is a well established online community, a redirect has been created, article has been cleaned up Jules 07:19, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blank and condense. ~1500 players online on average does not deserve such a large page. Too much unnecessary detail. -- infinity0 17:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.