Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boot-legged

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY REDIRECT to bootlegging. — brighterorange (talk) 16:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Boot-legged[edit]

It's a dictionary definition copied from the American Heritage Dictionary, so it's not the proper kind of thing to have here AND it's a possible copyvio. dcandeto 01:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as (signed) dicdef, perhaps Speedy A8 per nom. Royboy crashfan 01:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, with observation. The definition does not appear to be copied from the American Heritage Dictionary, though it cites that dictionary as a source. The section of translations seems to come from here: http://www.answers.com/topic/bootleg. That said, I don't think this is an especially good definition, a much better one appears on the bootleg disambiguation page. And what's up with the big Pokemon picture? Crypticfirefly 02:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:WINAD Шизомби 06:09, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete dicdef. --Ter e nc e Ong 08:43, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree, with nom. -- Samir ∙ T C 08:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WINAD. Nothing usable in that article.---Marcus- 13:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as dicdef at best. Turnstep 13:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.