Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boone Guyton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boone Guyton[edit]

Boone Guyton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:SOLDIER. Almost all of the sources are primary. Lettlerhellocontribs 04:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhellocontribs 04:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhellocontribs 04:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhellocontribs 04:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhellocontribs 04:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral - I'm pretty sure the subject is notable; WP:SOLDIER is not the be-all and end-all and a quick check shows a good number of potential sources (and he may be notable as an author for Air Base). But the current article as it stands is...yeesh. WP:TNT may be the best option here. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep fails WP:SOLDIER but seems to have SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG but needs rewrite as the page isn't written in WP style and most of the current sources seem to be Guyton himself. Mztourist (talk) 09:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Seems notable per WP:GNG. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, notable as an author and test pilot because sources cover him. Vici Vidi (talk) 08:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.