Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boodala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Boodala[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This would be best placed in a genealogy website, not an encyclopedia. AndieM (Leave a message!) 07:50, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree with nom. Family fails notability. ~dee^(talk?) 15:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails to meet notability standards. Biglulu (talk) 04:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 22:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.