Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BooM! Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 03:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BooM! Records[edit]

A very confusing article on a non-notable recording company. I could not find any reliable sources on the company and therefore fails WP:CORP. Tavix (talk) 00:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't show notabiliy per WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 01:13, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails notability per WP:CORP. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Quid Pro Quo²³ 07:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep and disambiguate~~ Cab Calloway? If that can be verified it seems like a major label to me. Not sure on the other label. Maybe just delete that one? ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if that is true. I couldn't find anything about any record labels from Cab Calloway. You are welcome to prove me wrong though. Tavix (talk) 21:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I removed the information about Bang and Shout records, article subjects covered elsewhere with no indication they are known as Boom record. I don't see a good indication of notability for the remaining record company. Perhaps it can be mentioned in the respective artist articles.ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:55, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For the first mentioned company: Delete the text relating to this company - it is unverifiable. CoM correctly identifies that if Cab Calloway were published on this label, it would be notable. But I think the first company is made up. For the second mentioned company, I think it probably is notable, but I am not a WP:MUSIC expert. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.