Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonus round (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. with merge possibilities (non-admin closure) czar · · 20:44, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonus round[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N. WP:NOT Dictionary, or collection of indiscriminate info. Comments about "first bonus round" belong in those specific articles for You Bet Your Life and Password, not in an entirely separate article. AldezD (talk) 13:09, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 18. Snotbot t • c » 20:16, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with no objection to a merge. Meets WP:N. I think the only real question is if is purely a dictionary definition. Given the history of the term in the article, I'm leaning toward no. Hobit (talk) 07:17, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 02:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep without prejudice to merge/redirect to Game show and individual show articles. I feel like it meets WP:N, isn't covered by WP:NOTDIC, nor is WP:INDISCRIMINATE, but it is really lacking in content. Ansh666 08:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.