Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonner Strassenbahn ROSWINDIS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonner Strassenbahn ROSWINDIS[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable individual locomotive. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 09:35, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I found this being discussed here: https://www.drehscheibe-online.de/foren/read.php?17,4264616 I'm not into locomotives, so I cannot comment much on notability, but apparently there are some folks out there who do find it historically notable enough to still discuss the topic. Given that interests are diverse and Wikipedia is for anyone, not just Joe Average, and because I find it important to preserve reliable information about historical topics (there's a lot that can be learnt from them also for present and future topics), and because there is clearly no commercial interest in such topics, I tend to suggest to keep rather than delete such topics. Actually, this also applies to the already deleted Cöln-Frechener Strassenbahn BENZELRATH topic for which Google turns up quite a few hits. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.