Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bond Gideon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bond Gideon[edit]

Bond Gideon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as insufficiently notable actress. Quis separabit? 21:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Her roles do not rise to the level of significance. For example, in the article on the film Operation Petticoat, we have a listing of 22 cast members. I am less than convinced that all 22 listed had significant roles. However Gideon does not even merit inclusion in that list of 22.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Insufficiently notable actress. --MelanieN (talk) 01:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.