Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bon Appétit Burlesque

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bon Appétit Burlesque[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTABILITY - no gnews hits, no ghits that establish notability, merely event listings Nat Gertler (talk) 19:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: While I'm cheered that burlesque is alive and well in my stomping ground, this is an utterly non-notable linkfarm for a bunch of performers' Facebook pages. No evidence of reliable sources discussing the subject in "significant detail," and the only close-to-reliable source even cited is a three-year-old piece from the local alternative weekly about one of this outfit's purported DJs. Ravenswing 05:22, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:43, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is nothing to indicate notability of this hyperlocal, once-a-month theatrical production. Google News finds nothing at all. Google finds nothing reliable. --MelanieN (talk) 14:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.