Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bomsori Kim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 05:10, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bomsori Kim[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violinist, but I have doubts he meets WP:CREATIVE/WP:NMUSIC. The only thing he has going for him is winning one competition, China International Violin Competition in Qingdao. He is also a "laureate" (but I don't think it means winner) of Finnish International Jean Sibelius Violin Competition (which has an unreferenced claim that "is considered[by whom?] to be one of the most prestigious violin competitions in the world", but I don't see much coverage of it, and none of the artist in question). He also has several 2nd and lower prizes. Comments appreciated on whether winning one - I think, minor - competition - coupled with some lower prizes, suffices to make one notable? I think it is not enough, but... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG and BLP BobLaRouche (talk) 04:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet the notabilty guidelines for a musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's simply participation in some music events, but everything else also shows it's only trivial and unconvincing; none of this amounts to genuine substance hence delete.SwisterTwister talk 16:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.