Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bolun Li

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | talk _ 19:08, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bolun Li[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much independent evidence of notability. Rathfelder (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it's not notable itself.
Delete. Two of the four references here are primary sources (a staff profile and a piece of his own bylined writing), and the other two are glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things — which means that none of them are establishing him as notable per WP:GNG, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG. Bearcat (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as PROMO for a non-notable activist, crated by an SPA, tagged for sourcing since 2017, and, as Bearcat says, inadequately sourced.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:29, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sign of significant coverage. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 10:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.