Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollygarch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus here is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bollygarch[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pointless article about a term used to describe Indian business people. Talks less about the term but more about prominent people to whom the term hasn't even been applied. More suited for Wiktionary. As User:1812ahill says on the Talk Page:

This article reads more like 'UK property portfolio of rich Indians' or something similar, on the basis of a newspaper wanting to grab a headline by coining a new word. Pointless.

Gotitbro (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:34, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - maybe good enough for Wiktionary but certainly not notable enough to pass GNG here Spiderone 13:44, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I concur, unlike the term "Oligarch" there hasn't been sufficient coverage of the term itself beyond being used as a simple tag-line. In effect it's a string of non SIG-COVs. Wikipedia is not the place for it. Nosebagbear (talk) 01:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.