Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bok Fu (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 14:06, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bok Fu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been deleted through AfD as non-notable. Nothing has changed but last AfD was long enough ago that another AfD is more appropriate than repost speedy delete. Only one or two of the references seem to be about the art directly and they are primary.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't appear to be any more notable than it was at the last AfD. The article lacks the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG and also doesn't appear to meet WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 19:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Article keeps being recreated without adding any information that supports claims of notability.204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no mention of Bok Fu in most of the citations. Nothing connects Bok Fu to the people cited who win matches. Early history is not specific to Bok Fu. --Bejnar (talk) 03:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.