Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boise Kimber

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 05:30, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boise Kimber[edit]

Boise Kimber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

as per WP:BLP1E, I find coverage that merely confirms he is a minister and was commissioner of the fire department. he is only really known for the court case hence WP:BLP1E. LibStar (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Per WP:Google test Huffington Post calls Kimber "powerful player within the black community".[1] He has appeared on C-SPAN in 2001, way before the lawsuit.[2] He is the subject of book describing Kimber other actions, which makes them WP:RS.[3] and has recently appeared in other news.[4][5][6] In my opinion, WP:BLP1E] is inapplicable as Kimber was "notorious" before and after the Supreme Court decision. Mhym (talk) 05:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 20:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.