Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boil over
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Bobet 22:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Boil over[edit]
Not notable. Protologism or neologism at the very best. Storkk 11:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The term "boil over" is used in cooking (i.e. when a pot of water boils over the rim, etc), so google results are deceiving. However, from what I can discern, this term is rarely used in this context. At best, this could be merged into the WRIF article. Srose (talk) 12:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename and Keep. Something like 'Boil over (sexual connotation)' would make it clear that the article was NOT about when water at 212°F over-flows a pot. The term is well known in the Detroit area. It should be mentioned that there are other such terms like rim-job, handjob, and blow job that are in the encyclopedia. MJCdetroit 12:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, what is in the encyclopaedia is not dictionary articles on "terms", but encyclopaedia articles on the subjects of anal-oral contact and oral sex. Apart from the etymology of a slang phrase, contrary to our Wikipedia is not a dictionary (of slang or otherwise) policy, there is nothing in this article that cannot be said at the proper title of ejaculation. At best, assuming that you cite sources to prove that this is indeed an alternative name that is in use, this would be a redirect. Uncle G 13:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. With no reliable sources attesting to the notability of this...icky thing... there's no grounds to keep. Seriously, I like to think of myself as an inclusionist (but realy I am uptight and stuffy)... but this article tests my patience because I am so above this sort of thing. Captainktainer * Talk 17:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Keep article" Not only is the term widely known in the Metro-Detroit area, but if you google it you will find many references to the term Boil Over
Keep the article, after reading the article most should be able to decern that this has nothing to do with boiling water or cooking. It is a slang term that may only be regional but like it or not it is used.
- Delete - This is a local neologism failing WP:NEO and also as a dictionary definition it fails WP:WINAD.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.