Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bohlenplatz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cabayi (talk) 19:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bohlenplatz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The info is highly generic and of little relevance. Some of the information could be put onto the page for Erlangen, such as the mention of the church and fleamarket, but most of it is rather unimportant trivialties in my opinion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Allenthalben (talk • contribs) 03:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allenthalben (talk • contribs) 03:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems a little light on sources and the German article doesn't help, but a Google Scholar/Books search seems to bring up a lot of mentions in German, and it is the main public square of a city of more than 100,000. Seems sourceable, which is the test, not whether our opinion is that an article is irrelevant or trivial. SportingFlyer T·C 22:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Major square in a city of more than 100,000 people. These are generally notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:10, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.