Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boguslaw Wozniak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Boguslaw Wozniak[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and notability criteria for politicians and judges. The only source in the article is a blog and I can not find anything else in reliable sources. Jbh ^Talk 21:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 21:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 21:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 21:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The "inherent" notability of deputy heads of state attaches to the deputy heads of state of real established countries with real diplomatic recognition, not to the self-appointed governments of virtually unrecognized micronations whose only established diplomatic relationship is with one other unrecognized polity, and no reliable source coverage has been shown to get him over WP:GNG as an individual in lieu. Bearcat (talk) 22:55, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bearcat. In lieu of the lack of "inherent" notability due to the "government" not being recognized by any established full-fledged nations, there is simply not enough reliable coverage to satisfy GNG. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article has an additional problem of being overly promotional. To call Liberland a "partially recognized" nation is an abuse of the term. South Ossetia is partially recognized. Liberland only has recognition from the unrecognized Somaliland, which has no political influence in the region where Liberland claims to exist, so it is an empty gesture.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per reasons laid out by everybody above, and what I /we all said at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Walls.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.