Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bogish Brand Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bogish Brand Entertainment[edit]

Non-notable record label that fails WP:CORP. It is distributed by a notable company, but the label itself is not notable. The author has a WP:COI issue. He is the manager of the labels founder (this was admitted on the talk page for Cashis and has been spoken to by a number of editors about his COI. Totally lacking in WP:RS and written in a self-promotional style. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:CORP. Esradekan Gibb ^"Klat" 11:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article. Definatly not a notable record label. Rikinatti has created and done almost all the edits on that page. He is a member of the label. LDNPRS (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]
  - Delete. Record Label Is Not Finished, There For Not Worthy As A Record Label. Rikanatti (talk) 23:32, 17 July 2009
That looks like a request for a Speedy G7 to me. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:46, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.