Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodytite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bodytite[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for a trademarked liposuction procedure. Would need to be rewritten to become encyclopedic. Could not find reliable, secondary sources to verify notability of the subject. The article's current references are all primary sources from Invasix, the company that owns the trademark. Gobonobo ^T ^C 22:55, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I found two papers assessing this new technology (PMID 19543679 and PMID 20195126), but this is only one of several radiofrequency liposuction procedures so I don't think it has much notability yet. I'd recommend a merge of the non-promotional material on how this works to Body_shaping#Laser_Assisted_Lipolysis_and_Radiofrequency. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Advertising. Carrite (talk) 02:20, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it like advertising. 207.81.170.99 (talk) 07:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP ARTICLE - BodyTite is the only RFAL Liposuction available today and is not the same as Laser Assisted Lipolysis. This is an entirely new cosmetic procedure and as such is worthy of being included in Wikipedia so that people can find additional information on this technique as other forms of cosmetic surgery vary considerably.

http://www.americanhealthandbeauty.com/articles/?article=2863 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.169.149 (talk) 10:09, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTADVERTISING. Unlikely that an unbiased, verifiable article can be salvaged from this. Uncle Dick (talk) 18:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article - This page is informative to people who are considering treatment. Such as other pages that discuss different treatments such as: "Vaser lipo" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaser

Medical reference: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002985.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.169.149 (talk) 20:34, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nomination. Dawnseeker2000 20:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please support the article to remain on wikipedia[edit]

Please support that the article be kept on Wikipedia if you have found the article of any interest or useful in its explanation of the RFAL Liposuction procedure, Thank you for reading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.169.149 (talk) 20:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.