Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodrida

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 03:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bodrida[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be the name of a field. I have searched back through the OS archives and, where this name occurs, it always appears to reference a field. I cannot imagine that Wikipedia's notability policy extends down to individual fields. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 00:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 00:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete An old OS map seems to indicate that "Bodriga" is the name of the farm that the current label sits in. That it is a farm is obvious from Gmaps, and unless someone can find a source showing it is a historically notable farm, the article needs to go. I especially like the pretentious "insular hamlet" as if it were a term, when the two words are WLed separately: yes, it is "insular" in being on an island, but no, it's not only not a special kind of hamlet, but the most cursory look at the thing from the air or on Streetview shows that it's not a hamlet at all. You really have to look at these things when writing articles on them. Mangoe (talk) 04:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete - per Mangoe, it is a farm, not a settlement. Streetview: [1]. Thus does not meet WP:GEOLAND. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: this is just a farm that does not meet WP:GEOLAND as established above. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:33, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yep, just a farm. An archeological survey in 2013 (the landowner wanted to install a wind turbine) uncovered not much of note. Essentially all that is available in RSs about it is the names of the 19th century landowners and tenant. Jfire (talk) 18:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.