Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Roe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No opposition to sources found. (non-admin closure) J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 03:30, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Roe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor/director lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. reddogsix (talk) 00:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Roe meets WP:BASIC with interviews at Dread Central[1], Script[2], Nerdist[3], Earwolf[4] and quite a few others (Daily Dead, Scream Magazine, LA Screenwriter, Moviehole) and also meets criteria 3 of WP:DIRECTOR as the co-creator of a well-known work as co-writer and director of both The Houses October Built and The Houses October Built 2. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 02:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have to say, I'm still unsure why this is being nominated. I don't think the reasons up top about being "non-notable" or "non-trivial" are either valid or good enough. Originally, the article was simply subjected to copyright but I don't think that was ever an issue. The error was fixed and to this day there's no violations. But now things have been taken a step further and Bobby Roe has been nominated for an unnecessary deletion. The criteria of Wikipedia has been met upon its creation and the user above makes a good point – the film is notable. -- AlexanderHovanec (talk) 01:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.