Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Joe Ebola and the Children MacNuggits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig's links remain unaddressed and, at first glance, seem to indicate notability. Sandstein 18:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Joe Ebola and the Children MacNuggits[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable under the criteria of WP:MUSIC, local San Fransisco act that put out their own releases. No indication of chart success, nationwide tours or a major label release. The article is largely promotional in tone and has a considerable CoI contribution. Sourcing is very poor and largely based on primary sources (Discogs and the band's own website) or local SF newspapers. Nothing to suggest that the band have a national profile of any sort. Karst (talk) 10:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete obviously promotional, and not significant, but that name.... wtf? Layla, the remover (talk) 20:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 23:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Article could use some work, but some decent coverage found, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. --Michig (talk) 09:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.