Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Pool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Pool[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NJOURNALIST. LA Times sources are not WP:Independent, and thus I do not see them as justifying notability. Couldn't find any independent coverage of him. — ♠ Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. ♠ 19:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Journalism. — ♠ Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. ♠ 19:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent sources turn up in WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. No independent coverage. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.