Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Lenzi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpower háblame 08:34, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bob Lenzi[edit]
I don't think this guy is notable enough (yet); sure, he has an IMDb entry, but anyone can submit info for an IMDb entry, and it looks to me as if his screen work has been bit parts - it even says in the article "seen for a little time on screen". The original editor's contributions list makes this look like vanity to me. A Google search for Bob Lenzi brings up 71 hits which seem to refer to other people. Delete CLW 13:39, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looking at the links, I'm not convinced he's actually appeared on Broadway, merely has done plays that have appeared on Broadway. The International Thespian Society is a US high school acting award. The Blood Brothers fan page linked to from the Blood Brothers article doesn't mention him. The more I look into this the less impressive his CV is. We have an average professor requirement, why not an average actor requirement? Average Earthman 15:40, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. Non-notable. Likely a hoax, as for someone who has supposedly been in major Broadway productions like The Last Five Years and Blood Brothers, IBDB hasn't even heard of him. --Kinu 18:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I visited the story on the "International Thespian Festival" provided as a reference in the article. It is a high school affair, which leads me to believe he's in high school. The listing of Blood Brothers under Broadway as I mentioned above was definitely misleading. No wonder IBDB didn't know who he was: it's amateur theater. Seems to be vanity. Amending vote above as "strong" to reflect this. --Kinu 21:29, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.