Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob King (speed coach)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bob King (speed coach)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One newspaper article isn't enough to support an article for a strength and conditioning coach, per WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the "good" article is at best marginal as well. SportingFlyer T·C 18:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see an article that is about strength-building in children and not about the subject, a client testimonial written by him, a few directory listings, and a broken link. Hardly satisfies WP:GNG. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete coaches this far down the roster are not notable. In large part because they have no direct influenece on how games develop.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.