Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Christie (film director)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Christie (film director)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article have no news article. Doesn't meet any criteria. So I think this page should be deleted. DasSoumik (talk) 10:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DasSoumik (talk) 10:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we need to stop having BLPs sourced only to an unreliable source and the subject's own website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Note, first of all, that notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not necessarily the current state of the article — if enough sources are available out there to repair the problems with an article, then we keep it. I've found and added four sources, which isn't as much as I would have liked but is clearly enough to pass WP:GNG. WP:BEFORE is your friend. Bearcat (talk) 04:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 05:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep indeed, lacked of WP:BEFORE. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:GNG per sources added by Bearcat. --Ashley yoursmile! 08:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.